Diversification improves investment outcomes
It is well known that diversification reduces portfolio risk and improves investment outcomes. By combining different assets that have a low or negative correlation to one another, the end result is worth more than the sum of its parts; that is, the overall volatility profile is reduced without necessarily sacrificing returns.
Static portfolios remain unchanged in terms of their asset allocation, as one finds in a traditional 60/40 portfolio holding stocks and bonds. This works well during certain macroeconomic environments, but not others. Evolving macroeconomic conditions and uncertainties call for a dynamic approach to asset allocation.
But the nature of diversification is not fixed
We can think about specific moments in history, where the two main asset classes – equities and bonds – have exhibited a positive or negative correlation relative to each other. Going back to the Financial Crisis of 2008 and its aftermath, bonds and equities had strong diversification benefits due to the prevalence of demand shocks. As the economy went into recession and equities declined, central banks cut interest rates, which lifted bond valuations.
Figure 1: 24-Month Rolling Stock-Bond Beta
Source: Fulcrum Asset Management, Haver Analytics
On the flip side, when demand began to recover, the market anticipated that the economy would improve, which raised equity prices. At the same time, this led to an expectation that central banks would normalise interest rates. Bond prices, which move inversely with interest rates, fell. In both the recession and recovery phase therefore, it was beneficial to hold bonds and equities together because they were negatively correlated (see period after GFC in Figure 1).
A more relevant historical scenario to consider in relation to 2022 is the 1970s, where the primary risks were inflation risk and interest rate risk resulting from energy supply shocks. During this period, the primary mover of the stock market was interest rate expectations. As interest rate expectations rose due to higher inflation, equity valuations suffered. At the same time, higher rates hit bond returns, leading to a positive correlation between the two asset classes. This meant that the traditional 60-40 portfolio performed poorly in this environment (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Inflation-Adjusted 60-40 Performance
Source: Fulcrum Asset Management, Haver Analytics
This is where commodities can bring diversification benefits. Indeed, the period of supply shocks and rising inflation in the 1970s was one where commodities worked well in a multi-asset portfolio. Last year was similar to the 1970s scenario in terms of covariance patterns between these different asset classes, with commodities providing an effective hedge against the supply shocks induced by war in Eastern Europe.
Understanding the macro environment is crucial
Active diversification across bonds, equities and commodities can be enhanced by the application of state-of-the-art macro research capabilities, using both market information and economic data to tell you what kind of environment you’re facing.
Sophisticated macro-econometric models can be used to study the co-movement of asset prices and macroeconomic aggregates. Crucially, at the heart of these models is the identification of fundamental macroeconomic shocks, and the recognition that asset prices are the outcome of such shocks. For example, positive (negative) shocks to global demand are likely to move oil up (down) and equity valuations up (down), whereas a positive (negative) shock to oil supply should move oil down (up) and equities up (down).
These models are at the heart of Fulcrum’s approach to dynamic asset allocation and are used to inform debate and discussion around our discretionary positions.
Looking ahead
Currently, we believe that interest rate risk remains substantial, and the path of inflation is uncertain. Although inflation has declined recently, it remains material to central bank target rates and vulnerable to future commodity price shocks. Moreover, resilient US economic activity has fueled talk of persistently higher real interest rates going forward. This complicates the investment picture and reinforces the importance of being able to identify and react to evolving macroeconomic conditions.
In light of this, we prefer an investment approach that is diversified across strategies. While our Discretionary Macro approach provides a stream of returns that is less correlated to traditional asset classes, it is complemented by our Dynamic Asset Allocation approach, which provides varying degrees of long exposure to bonds and equities, with some level of commodity allocation to protect against supply shocks. When combined with an allocation to a world class trend-following strategy, and a rigorous approach to risk management, we believe that a blend of these strategies can provide robust risk-adjusted returns throughout a changing macroeconomic environment.
This content is provided for informational purposes and is directed to clients and eligible counterparties as defined in Directive 2011/61/EU (AIFMD) and Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II) Annex II Section I or Section II or an investor with an equivalent status as defined by your local jurisdiction. Fulcrum Asset Management LLP (“Fulcrum”) does not produce independent Investment Research and any content disseminated is not prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such should be deemed as marketing communications. This document is also considered to be a minor non-monetary (‘MNMB’) benefit under Directive 2014/65/EU on Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (‘MiFID II’) which transposed into UK domestic law under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended). Fulcrum defines MNMBs as documentation relating to a financial instrument or an investment service which is generic in nature and may be simultaneously made available to any investment firm wishing to receive it or to the general public. The following information may have been disseminated in conferences, seminars and other training events on the benefits and features of a specific financial instrument or an investment service provided by Fulcrum.
Any views and opinions expressed are for informational and/or similarly educational purposes only and are a reflection of the author’s best judgment, based upon information available at the time obtained from sources believed to be reliable and providing information in good faith, but no responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions. Charts and graphs provided herein are for illustrative purposes only. The information contained herein is only as current as of the date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Some of the statements may be forward-looking statements or statements of future expectations based on the currently available information. Accordingly, such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. For example, factors such as the development of macroeconomic conditions, future market conditions, unusual catastrophic loss events, changes in the capital markets and other circumstances may cause the actual events or results to be materially different from those anticipated by such statements. In no case whatsoever will Fulcrum be liable to anyone for any decision made or action taken in conjunction with the information and/or statements in this press release or for any related damages. Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of Fulcrum Copyright © Fulcrum Asset Management LLP 2024. All rights reserved.